<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Important Differences between Firefox and IE Caching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching</link>
	<description>News, articles and all things HttpWatch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android News</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-46679</link>
		<dc:creator>Android News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-46679</guid>
		<description>Ok but i want them both cache it. What will i use then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok but i want them both cache it. What will i use then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Demaio</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-37835</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Demaio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-37835</guid>
		<description>In order to enforce the NO caching PHP session_start fucntion pulls out all these headers:

Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT

Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0

Pragma: no-cache

I would reccomend anyone who does not want to cache a page to either use a session or anyway to send to browser the same headers show above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to enforce the NO caching PHP session_start fucntion pulls out all these headers:</p>
<p>Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT</p>
<p>Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0</p>
<p>Pragma: no-cache</p>
<p>I would reccomend anyone who does not want to cache a page to either use a session or anyway to send to browser the same headers show above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Age Yourself</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-36368</link>
		<dc:creator>Age Yourself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 10:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-36368</guid>
		<description>Is Chrome any different? How does it perform these actions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Chrome any different? How does it perform these actions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koowie</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-36174</link>
		<dc:creator>Koowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-36174</guid>
		<description>This is a very informative article.  Didn&#039;t know all the caching differences between the tow browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very informative article.  Didn&#8217;t know all the caching differences between the tow browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

