<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Important Differences between Firefox and IE Caching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/</link>
	<description>News, articles and all things HttpWatch</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick H</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-12526</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-12526</guid>
		<description>Two questions:

1. Anyone know if the Mozilla bug # 441751 has been integrated into Firefox 3.5? The bug says that it was fixed in moz1.9.1, but I'm not too familiar with their versioning these days. 

I'm still seeing the "POST content retrievable via back, with no-cache set" problem in Firefox 3.5.5. 

2. Surprisingly, the same problem is evident in IE8. Anyone know anything about that? 

Could this be because the no-store directive isn't set as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two questions:</p>
<p>1. Anyone know if the Mozilla bug # 441751 has been integrated into Firefox 3.5? The bug says that it was fixed in moz1.9.1, but I&#8217;m not too familiar with their versioning these days. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still seeing the &#8220;POST content retrievable via back, with no-cache set&#8221; problem in Firefox 3.5.5. </p>
<p>2. Surprisingly, the same problem is evident in IE8. Anyone know anything about that? </p>
<p>Could this be because the no-store directive isn&#8217;t set as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Httpwatch Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-11117</link>
		<dc:creator>Httpwatch Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-11117</guid>
		<description>Asmaa,

You need to use 'no-cache' and 'no-store', not 'no cache' and 'no store'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asmaa,</p>
<p>You need to use &#8216;no-cache&#8217; and &#8216;no-store&#8217;, not &#8216;no cache&#8217; and &#8216;no store&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asmaa</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-11112</link>
		<dc:creator>Asmaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-11112</guid>
		<description>I want to prevent back button after sign out I tried using cache-control:no cache , no store also I used expires with them but it didn't work

is there any soln for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to prevent back button after sign out I tried using cache-control:no cache , no store also I used expires with them but it didn&#8217;t work</p>
<p>is there any soln for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OnlyLonely &#38; Marshall&#8217;s &#187; IE add cache-control:no-cache to 302 redirect</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-9576</link>
		<dc:creator>OnlyLonely &#38; Marshall&#8217;s &#187; IE add cache-control:no-cache to 302 redirect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.httpwatch.com/?p=177#comment-9576</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/    分类: Web, 技术 标签:     随机日志zz:Tomcat的中文乱码的经典解决方案开始学用SeleniumFirefox实现text-overflow:ellipsisVelocity的扩展宝船公园及公交游     评论 (0) Trackbacks (0) 发表评论 Trackback [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/10/15/two-important-differences-between-firefox-and-ie-caching/</a>    分类: Web, 技术 标签:     随机日志zz:Tomcat的中文乱码的经典解决方案开始学用SeleniumFirefox实现text-overflow:ellipsisVelocity的扩展宝船公园及公交游     评论 (0) Trackbacks (0) 发表评论 Trackback [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
