<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are people saying about HttpWatch?</title>
	<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/04/23/what-are-people-saying-about-httpwatch/</link>
	<description>News, articles and all things HttpWatch</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diego Carrera</title>
		<link>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/04/23/what-are-people-saying-about-httpwatch/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Carrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.httpwatch.com/2008/04/23/what-are-people-saying-about-httpwatch/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>This is one of the best tools out there for IE, it is nice to have some of the abilities that firebug users had been able to enjoy for some time now; in my humble opinion it is a good start, but it would be nice to be able to do much more things, like dom inspection, on the fly css properties edition and so on.

Kudos for the httpwatch team! keep the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best tools out there for IE, it is nice to have some of the abilities that firebug users had been able to enjoy for some time now; in my humble opinion it is a good start, but it would be nice to be able to do much more things, like dom inspection, on the fly css properties edition and so on.</p>
<p>Kudos for the httpwatch team! keep the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
